A PLM discovers a data destruction incident affecting borrower records. Which sequence correctly outlines the response steps?

Prepare for the Utah Mortgage PLM Exam. Study with flashcards and multiple choice questions, with each question providing hints and explanations. Gear up for test day!

Multiple Choice

A PLM discovers a data destruction incident affecting borrower records. Which sequence correctly outlines the response steps?

Explanation:
The sequence tested is how to respond to a data destruction incident in a way that stops ongoing harm, informs those affected, restores operations, and improves defenses. You want to contain the incident first so you stop any further loss of borrower data. Once containment is in place, you assess the impact and notify affected parties as required by policy and law. After people are informed, you work to recover the data and restore normal operations. The final step is to review and strengthen security controls to prevent a recurrence and address gaps revealed by the incident. Starting with notifying affected parties before containment would risk broader exposure and mischaracterize the scope; skipping the post-incident review would miss essential improvements. The listed sequence that begins with containment, then notification, then recovery, and finally reviewing security controls reflects the appropriate order for an effective incident response.

The sequence tested is how to respond to a data destruction incident in a way that stops ongoing harm, informs those affected, restores operations, and improves defenses. You want to contain the incident first so you stop any further loss of borrower data. Once containment is in place, you assess the impact and notify affected parties as required by policy and law. After people are informed, you work to recover the data and restore normal operations. The final step is to review and strengthen security controls to prevent a recurrence and address gaps revealed by the incident.

Starting with notifying affected parties before containment would risk broader exposure and mischaracterize the scope; skipping the post-incident review would miss essential improvements. The listed sequence that begins with containment, then notification, then recovery, and finally reviewing security controls reflects the appropriate order for an effective incident response.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy